Analysis of longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcomes with informative and non-informative dropout: Comparison of CTT and Rasch-based methods
theory with its most used model, the Rasch model. In many studies, PRO are collected longitudinally in order to study the evolution of the outcome through time. Missing data are frequently encountered in longitudinal studies and can be potentially informative. This study aimed at comparing Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Rasch-based approaches to analyze longitudinal PRO collected from a scale validated with a Rasch model and studying the impact of dropout, informative or not, on both approaches. Data with informative dropout have shown estimation bias and have to be analyzed with more appropriate methods. For complete data and data with non-informative dropout, a method of analysis based on the Rasch model may be preferred for the analysis of longitudinal PRO collected from a scale validated with a Rasch model due to the generally observed slight gain of power and the
psychometric properties of the model.
Disclaimer/Regarding indexing issue:
We have provided the online access of all issues and papers to the indexing agencies (as given on journal web site). It’s depend on indexing agencies when, how and what manner they can index or not. Hence, we like to inform that on the basis of earlier indexing, we can’t predict the today or future indexing policy of third party (i.e. indexing agencies) as they have right to discontinue any journal at any time without prior information to the journal. So, please neither sends any question nor expects any answer from us on the behalf of third party i.e. indexing agencies.Hence, we will not issue any certificate or letter for indexing issue. Our role is just to provide the online access to them. So we do properly this and one can visit indexing agencies website to get the authentic information.